Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S is slightly better than vivo X50 Pro, with a 76.2 score against 75.4. Both phones in this comparison review have the same Android 10 OS, so both of them should provide you all the same OS features. The nubia Red Magic 5S design is heavier and thicker than the vivo X50 Pro. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a little sharper display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch and a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit faster processor than vivo X50 Pro. Both have 8 CPU cores and 8 GB of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 5S captures a little bit better photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing photos or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Vivo X50 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has more internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little longer battery life than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4315mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.