Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 has an overall score of 76.1, which is just a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 score. The Galaxy A22 construction is newer, but a little thicker and a bit heavier than the vivo X50 Pro. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Galaxy A22 has 12 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version, counting with some extra features.
The vivo X50 Pro features a sharper screen than Galaxy A22, because it has a little bigger display, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a higher number of pixels per screen inch. Vivo X50 Pro features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The vivo X50 Pro has a little bit more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A22, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X50 Pro takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy A22, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the vivo X50 Pro also has a bigger aperture for better low-light images and video and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
The vivo X50 Pro features a superior battery duration than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.