Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30 is slightly better than vivo X50 Pro, with a 79.6 score against 75.4. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A30 is older than the vivo X50 Pro, it's design is just a bit thinner and a bit lighter. Vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a just a little lower number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2376px resolution and a quite larger display.
The vivo X50 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM memory. The vivo X50 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same sensor size, the vivo X50 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited environments, a much higher video resolution and a much more mega pixels camera.
Vivo X50 Pro has a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A30, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X50 Pro features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A30, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.