Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | -- |
| Alpha grey | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has an overall score of 82, which is just a bit better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 general score. These devices have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has newer 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, so it gives some nice extra features and better performance. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only's body is a bit thicker but notably lighter than vivo X50 Pro, and both were only released 7 months apart.
The vivo X50 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has just a bit better screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater screen density and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The vivo X50 Pro features just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Vivo X50 Pro has a bit better camera than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low-light environments and a lot larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A32 LTE Only features longer battery performance than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4315mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.