Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A40 has an overall score of 79.6, which is a little bit better than the vivo X50 Pro's score of 75.4. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A40 has a more recent 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy A40 body is way lighter and a bit thinner than vivo X50 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released about 16 months before.
Galaxy A40 counts with just a bit better display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixel number per inch of screen. The vivo X50 Pro features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X50 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. Vivo X50 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy A40, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor, the vivo X50 Pro also has a way higher video definition, a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy A40, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.