Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A41 has a global score of 81.7, which is slightly better than the vivo X50 Pro's score of 75.4. The Galaxy A41 design is a little bit thinner and lighter than the vivo X50 Pro, even when they were only released with a couple months difference. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A41 has the newer 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, so it gives a couple additional features and increased performance.
Galaxy A41 has a slightly better display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels number per inch in the display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The vivo X50 Pro features a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A41, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy A41, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A41 takes clearer photographs and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A41 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a 23 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.