Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is much better than vivo X50 Pro, with an 86.6 score against 75.4. These devices use the same Android 10 OS (operating system). Even though Samsung Galaxy A50s is older than the vivo X50 Pro, it's body is just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A50s and vivo X50 Pro feature similar screens, because although the Galaxy A50s has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixels density. The Galaxy A50s features slightly more storage for games and applications than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Vivo X50 Pro features just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A50s, because it has an 8 percent larger battery size. Galaxy A50s shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a camera in the back with a 48 MP, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.