Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is much better than the vivo X50 Pro, getting an 85.5 score against 75.4. Galaxy A51 is a just a little thinner and a little lighter phone than vivo X50 Pro, although both of them were released only 7 months apart. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 has newer 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, so it offers some extra features.
The vivo X50 Pro has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM. The vivo X50 Pro and the Galaxy A51 both count with similar displays, because although the Galaxy A51 has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit greater display pixel density.
The Galaxy A51 counts with just a bit more memory to install applications and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The vivo X50 Pro has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy A51 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates, a 48 mega-pixels back-facing camera and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a way larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.