Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is a lot better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 global score. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the newer 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G design is just a little heavier and just a little bit thicker than vivo X50 Pro.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a display that's just as good as the display in vivo X50 Pro, because although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G has a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G features a bit superior battery performance than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy A51 5G features a little bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing images in low-light environments, and they both have a back camera with a 48 mega-pixels resolution, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.