Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Alpha grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 overall score. Even being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy A52's construction is just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier than the vivo X50 Pro. Galaxy A52 counts with a screen that is just as good as vivo X50 Pro's display, because although the Galaxy A52 has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater screen density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The vivo X50 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A52 counts with a slightly better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures and videos.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 features a bit better battery performance than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.