Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Alpha grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is way better than vivo X50 Pro's general score of 75.4. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version. Despite being the best in our current comparison, the Galaxy A52 5G is an a bit thicker and just a little heavier phone than vivo X50 Pro.
The vivo X50 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G both count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little better pixel amount in each inch of screen. The vivo X50 Pro has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A52 5G takes just a bit better pictures and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photos and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a lot larger sensor capturing much better quality photos and a much more megapixels back camera.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with more memory capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a little better battery duration than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.