Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is way better than the vivo X50 Pro's general score of 75.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy A52s has newer 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. Galaxy A52s's construction is newer than vivo X50 Pro's, although it's a little heavier and a bit thicker.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X50 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52s features a screen that's just as good as the screen in vivo X50 Pro, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit better display pixels density.
Galaxy A52s captures slightly better pictures and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy A52s features a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a bit superior battery duration than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.