Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A6 is slightly better than the vivo X50 Pro, with a 75.8 score against 75.4. The Galaxy A6 is an much older cellphone than the vivo X50 Pro, but it's lighter and a little bit thinner anyway. Vivo X50 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X50 Pro features a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a bigger display, a way better 1080 x 2376 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. Vivo X50 Pro features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The vivo X50 Pro has a superior battery life than Galaxy A6, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X50 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have a same size sensor, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger aperture, a way better video definition and a much higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.