Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) is slightly better than the vivo X50 Pro, getting a global score of 75.8 against 75.4. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) design is a little thinner than vivo X50 Pro, although it's a little bit heavier and was released many years before. The vivo X50 Pro has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a bigger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a just a bit higher pixels density.
The vivo X50 Pro features a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X50 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The vivo X50 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a camera with a way higher resolution, a bigger camera aperture and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The vivo X50 Pro counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 20% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.