Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro, with a 76.9 score against 75.4. Both of these devices come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect. Despite of the fact Galaxy A70 is older and a little heavier than vivo X50 Pro, it's body is still a little thinner.
Vivo X50 Pro has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The vivo X50 Pro features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2376 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch.
The vivo X50 Pro has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the vivo X50 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low light environments.
The Galaxy A70 has a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A70 has a little longer battery life than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.