Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 has a general score of 87.5, which is much better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 score. Although Galaxy A71 and the vivo X50 Pro were released with only 6 months difference, Galaxy A71 is a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 has the newer 11 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version, counting with some nice extra features and enhanced performance.
The vivo X50 Pro features a little sharper display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2376 resolution, it also counts with a little greater number of pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy A71 counts with a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Vivo X50 Pro features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A71 features just a little better battery performance than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4315mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a little bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light images, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a much larger sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.