Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is much better than the vivo X50 Pro's score of 75.4. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW design is a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than the vivo X50 Pro. These devices include the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so they should give identical OS features.
Vivo X50 Pro and Galaxy A71 5G UW count with really similar displays, because although the Galaxy A71 5G UW has a just a bit worse count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a processor that's just as good as the CPU in vivo X50 Pro, both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 8 GB RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little better battery life than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G UW captures just a bit better photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light captures, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a lot bigger sensor which provides a way better image and video quality and a back facing camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.