Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A8 (2018) has an overall score of 79.2, which is a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 score. The Galaxy A8 (2018) is a noticeably older and just a little thicker cellphone than the vivo X50 Pro, but Samsung made it a little bit lighter anyway. Vivo X50 Pro counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) features a bit more vivid display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2220px, it also counts with a quite better count of pixels in each screen inch. The vivo X50 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a way higher (4K) video resolution and a lot better 48 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The vivo X50 Pro has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. Vivo X50 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 44% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.