Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) is much better than vivo X50 Pro, getting an 85.2 score against 75.4. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) body is a little bit thinner than vivo X50 Pro, but it's a little heavier and was released just a little more than a year before. Vivo X50 Pro features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a quite greater count of pixels in each screen inch, a slightly better 1080 x 2376px resolution and a quite larger screen.
Vivo X50 Pro has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) features a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The vivo X50 Pro features just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4315mAh battery capacity instead of 3800mAh. Vivo X50 Pro takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a 0.36 inches sensor, the vivo X50 Pro also has a camera with lot more mega-pixels and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.