Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-07-24 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Alpha is a little bit better than vivo X50 Pro, getting a 76.3 score against 75.4. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but Galaxy Alpha has a more recent 4.4.4 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version. The Galaxy Alpha design is much lighter and somewhat thinner than the vivo X50 Pro.
Vivo X50 Pro features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores and more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Alpha has a bit better looking screen than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a much smaller screen, a just a bit worse number of pixels per inch in the display and a way worse 1280 x 720 pixels resolution.
Vivo X50 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Vivo X50 Pro has a much longer battery life than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 132% bigger battery size. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the vivo X50 Pro also has a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.