Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-07-24 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Alpha grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C5 has a general score of 76.4, which is a little bit better than the vivo X50 Pro's score of 75.4. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but Galaxy C5 has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, providing the user a couple nice extra features. The Galaxy C5 is an much older phone than vivo X50 Pro, but it's thinner and notably lighter anyway.
The vivo X50 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The vivo X50 Pro features a bit sharper display than Galaxy C5, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2376px.
The vivo X50 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a larger aperture for better low light images and video, a much better (4K) video definition and a camera with much more MP. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy C5, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X50 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy C5, because it has a 66% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.