Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F41 has a global score of 85.2, which is much better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 overall score. Even being the best device in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy F41's construction is a little thicker and a little heavier than the vivo X50 Pro. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy F41 has the newer 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy F41 has a little more vivid screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy F41 features a little bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor and a back-facing camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Vivo X50 Pro has a better memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy F41 features a really longer battery duration than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 39 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.