Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is better than vivo X50 Pro, with an 88.1 score against 75.4. Samsung Galaxy F62 is better than the vivo X50 Pro, it must be told that it is also thicker and heavier. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy F62 has newer 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, so it offers some additional features.
The vivo X50 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores. Galaxy F62 counts with a little bit better screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Galaxy F62 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a back facing camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy F62 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 features a really longer battery life than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4315mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.