Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than the vivo X50 Pro, having a 97.6 score against 75.4. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Fold is older and noticeably heavier than the vivo X50 Pro, it's construction is still somewhat thinner. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10.
The vivo X50 Pro has a bit better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2376 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better number of pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy Fold features a little faster CPU than vivo X50 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Fold has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better battery duration than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4380mAh battery size instead of 4315mAh. The vivo X50 Pro features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, lower video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.