Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 84.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-03-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Midnight blue and Raven black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M21 has a score of 84.1, which is much better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 general score. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy M21's construction is a little heavier and a little bit thicker than the vivo X50 Pro. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy M21 has newer 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, providing you lots of additional features.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy M21, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy M21 features a slightly better looking screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel amount per screen inch.
Vivo X50 Pro has a bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy M21, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy M21 features a superior battery lifetime than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 39 percent greater battery size. The Samsung Galaxy M21 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a same resolution camera in the back and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy M21 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.