Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M40 is better than vivo X50 Pro, getting an 85 score against 75.4. The Galaxy M40 construction is a bit thinner and a little lighter than the vivo X50 Pro, although it was released just 13 months before. These devices use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so they should provide very similar operating system features.
Galaxy M40 has a screen that's very similar to the vivo X50 Pro one, because although the Galaxy M40 has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixels density. Vivo X50 Pro has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Vivo X50 Pro takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a 0.36 inches sensor and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the vivo X50 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a 23% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.