Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 is better than vivo X50 Pro, having a overall score of 87.7 against 75.4. Although the Galaxy M51 is better than vivo X50 Pro, we must tell that it is also somewhat thicker and heavier. These phones come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both should provide you all the same OS features.
Vivo X50 Pro has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X50 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. The vivo X50 Pro features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2376px resolution and a little bit higher screen density.
Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M51 features a way better battery life than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Galaxy M51 captures a little bit better photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photos and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a lot larger camera sensor and a much higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.