Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the vivo X50 Pro, getting a general score of 90.8 against 75.4. Even being the best we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is an a little heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone than vivo X50 Pro. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 and vivo X50 Pro count with incredibly similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a just a bit worse amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has just a little better processing power than vivo X50 Pro. They have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM. Vivo X50 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because it has more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a battery life that is just as good as the vivo X50 Pro one, although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4315mAh.
The vivo X50 Pro has a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a much smaller sensor, and they both have the same video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments, better 30 frames per second video frame rate and a lot higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.