Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro, with an 81.2 score against 75.4. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is older and just a little bit thicker than the vivo X50 Pro, it's construction is still just a little bit lighter.
Vivo X50 Pro features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 3 has a bit more vivid screen than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a little smaller screen, a little bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
Vivo X50 Pro features a superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The vivo X50 Pro captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the vivo X50 Pro also has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a way larger aperture for better low light photos and videos and a bigger sensor.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 35% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.