Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than the vivo X50 Pro's global score of 75.4. Galaxy Note10's body is a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than the vivo X50 Pro, even though it was released only 11 months before. Vivo X50 Pro and Galaxy Note10 both feature very similar screens, because although the Galaxy Note10 has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a little greater display pixels density.
The Galaxy Note10 has a bit better processing unit than vivo X50 Pro. They have the same RAM amount and 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note10's storage capacity to store more apps and games is just as good as the vivo X50 Pro one, they have exactly the same internal storage. Vivo X50 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, a smaller aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.