Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite has an overall score of 86.2, which is better than vivo X50 Pro's global score of 75.4. Galaxy Note10 Lite is an a bit heavier and a little thicker cellphone than vivo X50 Pro. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note10 Lite has 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, giving you some additional features and performance tweaks.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a screen that is very similar to vivo X50 Pro's display, because although the Galaxy Note10 Lite has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a better memory to install applications and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little faster processing unit than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X50 Pro shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a lot better 48 MP resolution back camera and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit superior battery performance than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.