Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note3 has the newer 4.4.2 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy Note3 design is a little lighter than the vivo X50 Pro, although it's just a little thicker and was released many years before.
The vivo X50 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a bigger screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2376px resolution and a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The vivo X50 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM.
Vivo X50 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X50 Pro features improved battery performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4315mAh battery capacity.
The vivo X50 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also has a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos, a much larger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments and a way more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.