Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note4 has a general score of 77.6, which is just a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro's score of 75.4. Galaxy Note4 is a noticeably older and just a bit thicker cellphone than the vivo X50 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it a bit lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a bit more vivid display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels number per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The vivo X50 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The vivo X50 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy Note4, because although it has a smaller sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a much bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images and video in low-light environments and a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Vivo X50 Pro has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X50 Pro features improved battery life than Galaxy Note4, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.