Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note5 is a little bit better than the vivo X50 Pro, with a score of 80.2 against 75.4. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy Note5 is much older than vivo X50 Pro, it's construction is a bit lighter and a little thinner. The Galaxy Note5 features a little bit better looking screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X50 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The vivo X50 Pro has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Vivo X50 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a bigger aperture and a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.