Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 is just a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro, getting a global score of 79.5 against 75.4. Even though Galaxy Note7 is extremely older than the vivo X50 Pro, it's design is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter. The Galaxy Note7 counts with a bit better display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The vivo X50 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has more CPU cores and 4 GB more RAM.
Vivo X50 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photos and a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The vivo X50 Pro has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.