Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is much better than vivo X50 Pro's score of 75.4. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S10 is older than vivo X50 Pro, it's body is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter. These devices have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has the newer 11 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, giving lots of additional features and performance improvements.
The Galaxy S10 has a bit better looking display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy S10 has a bit superior CPU than vivo X50 Pro. Both have 8 processing cores and 8 GB of RAM.
Vivo X50 Pro captures a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor providing a lower image quality, slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Galaxy S10 features a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The vivo X50 Pro counts with better battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has a 4315mAh battery size instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.