Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is much better than the vivo X50 Pro's general score of 75.4. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy S10 5G has a newer 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. Despite of the fact the Galaxy S10 5G is older and a bit heavier than the vivo X50 Pro, it's design is still just a little bit thinner.
Galaxy S10 5G has a little bit better hardware performance than vivo X50 Pro. Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 8 GB RAM. The Galaxy S10 5G features a little bit better display than vivo X50 Pro, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and a bit larger display.
Vivo X50 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S10 5G have incredibly similar memory capacity for games and applications, both have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a little better battery duration than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4% more battery size. Vivo X50 Pro has a bit better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has worse video frame rate, a smaller camera sensor capturing lower quality pictures and a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.