Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than vivo X50 Pro, having a score of 89.7 against 75.4. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a a little bit heavier phone than vivo X50 Pro, but both have the same thickness. Galaxy S10 Lite features just a little better hardware performance than vivo X50 Pro. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a display that is very similar to the display in vivo X50 Pro, because although the Galaxy S10 Lite has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little larger screen. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features just a little bit longer battery performance than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photography, and they both have the same video resolution and the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a lot larger camera sensor and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.