Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is much better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 overall score. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy S10e is older than the vivo X50 Pro, it's construction is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy S10e features a little better processing power than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit better looking screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen density. The vivo X50 Pro features a bit better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and/or video in low-light situations, a smaller camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a much better 48 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a slightly better storage capacity to install games and applications than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Vivo X50 Pro has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 39 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.