Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is way better than vivo X50 Pro's general score of 75.4. Samsung Galaxy S20 is a a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter phone than vivo X50 Pro, even though both of them were released only a few months apart. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 has newer 13 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy S20 features a bit more vivid display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a greater pixel density. Samsung Galaxy S20 features a greater memory for games and applications than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better performance than vivo X50 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The vivo X50 Pro features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a much smaller camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and video, better 30 frames per second video frame rates and a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera.
Vivo X50 Pro has just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has a 4315mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.