Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is way better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 global score. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Galaxy S20 FE has a newer 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, providing you some extra features. Even being the best in this review, Galaxy S20 FE is an a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier cellphone than the vivo X50 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit more vivid display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a little better display pixel density. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a better storage for apps and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a bit better processor than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X50 Pro takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a lot smaller sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a back camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features just a bit longer battery life than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4315mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.