Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is a lot better than vivo X50 Pro's overall score of 75.4. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better phone than the vivo X50 Pro, we must tell that it is also a just a little bit thicker and heavier phone.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than vivo X50 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a little bit bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a higher screen density.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features more memory capacity for apps and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with superior battery performance than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality photos and videos and a much better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.