Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 722.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 has a score of 91.8, which is much better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 score. Galaxy S21 is a just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter device than the vivo X50 Pro, although both were released only 6 months apart. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but Galaxy S21 has a newer 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version, giving you a couple additional features.
Samsung Galaxy S21 features a better display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite better quantity of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy S21 has a little faster processor than vivo X50 Pro. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
The vivo X50 Pro shoots clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S21, because although it has a way tinier back-facing camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture and higher 30 fps video frame rates.
Vivo X50 Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S21, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X50 Pro has a bit better battery life than Galaxy S21, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.