Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Phantom black and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 Ultra has a global score of 98.1, which is much better than the vivo X50 Pro's overall score of 75.4. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, Galaxy S21 Ultra's construction is just a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier than vivo X50 Pro. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but Galaxy S21 Ultra has newer 11 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version, so it offers some nice extra features.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a little bit larger screen and a greater display density. Vivo X50 Pro has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S21 Ultra, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with just a bit better processing power than vivo X50 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra also has more RAM. Galaxy S21 Ultra has a greater camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot better video definition, a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Galaxy S21 Ultra has better battery lifetime than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.