Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is a lot better than the vivo X50 Pro's overall score of 75.4. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy S22 is a newer phone, and it's also just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the vivo X50 Pro.
The Galaxy S22 counts with a processor that's just as good as the vivo X50 Pro one, both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 features a much more vibrant screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixel density.
The Galaxy S22 shoots much better photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, it also counts with a lot better video quality, a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality photos and videos.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Vivo X50 Pro features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.