Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the vivo X50 Pro, having a 95.4 score against 75.4. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. Although the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is newer than the vivo X50 Pro, it's a bit thicker and way heavier.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better screen than vivo X50 Pro, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a little larger display. The vivo X50 Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have 8 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores.
Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much better videos and photos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better video quality, a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera in the back with a way higher resolution. Vivo X50 Pro features much more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features greater battery duration than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.