Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-24 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 6.40 ounces | -- |
| Alpha grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro, getting an 82.6 score against 75.4. The Galaxy S25 construction is noticeably thinner and much lighter than vivo X50 Pro. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy S25 has a newer 14 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. Galaxy S25 features a brighter display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels amount in each inch of screen.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount. The Galaxy S25 counts with a much better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures, a back camera with more MP and a lot better video definition.
Vivo X50 Pro has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The vivo X50 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has an 8 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.