| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2013-03-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Polycarbonate |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Samsung Galaxy S4 is slightly better than vivo X50 Pro, having a 79 score against 75.4. Samsung Galaxy S4's design is way lighter and just a bit thinner than vivo X50 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S4 has 4.4 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy S4 features a better looking display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixel density. Vivo X50 Pro has a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S4, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and more RAM.
The vivo X50 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has a much larger aperture to capture better photography in low light situations, a way more megapixels camera, a larger back camera sensor and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition. The vivo X50 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S4, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy S4, because it has a 66% bigger battery size.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.