| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Galaxy S5 Sport has a global score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than vivo X50 Pro's overall score of 75.4. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy S5 Sport has the newer 4.4.2 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. The Galaxy S5 Sport body is lighter than the vivo X50 Pro, although it's a little thicker and was released 6 years before.
The vivo X50 Pro features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM memory and more processing cores. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a much better screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X50 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera and a lot larger aperture.
The vivo X50 Pro features a superior battery performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 54% more battery size.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.