| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2015-04-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 252.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2550mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Samsung Galaxy S6 is better than the vivo X50 Pro, having a global score of 87.4 against 75.4. Samsung Galaxy S6 is an noticeably older phone than vivo X50 Pro, but it is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter anyway. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S6 has an older 5.0 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy S6 features a little better processing power than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64-bit CPU. The Galaxy S6 features a lot better screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater display density.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy S6, because it has more internal memory capacity. The vivo X50 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S6, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light images and video and a lot more megapixels camera.
The vivo X50 Pro has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity instead of 2550mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.